Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Electron Systems for Next-Generation Superconducting Technology

Authors

Keywords:

Fermi-Hubbard Model, Quantum Eigensolver, Ground-State Energy, Classical Simulation, Correlation Functions

Abstract

We report a systematic quantum simulation study of strongly correlated electron systems described by the 2D Fermi-Hubbard model, executed across superconducting quantum processors ranging from 16 to 127 qubits. Employing variational quantum eigensolver protocols combined with probabilistic error cancellation and zero-noise extrapolation mitigation techniques, we characterized ground-state energies, spin-spin correlation functions, and d-wave superconducting pairing correlations over the parameter regime, U/t ∈ [2, 12] and doping levels δ ∈ [0.05, 0.25]. Errors in the ground-state energy for simulations were found to be within 3.2 mHa per site relative to the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) benchmark for circuit depths up to 400 two-qubit gate layers and a 127-qubit scale. The extracted d-wave pairing susceptibility had a distinct peak at U/t ≈ 8.0 and δ ≈ 0.15, which is comparable to the theoretically predicted values of cuprate-class high-temperature superconductors. Quantum advantage onset is identified at system sizes beyond 48 qubits under realistic noise conditions when tensor network classical simulation costs become prohibitive. The findings provide a clear-cut computational roadmap from the ability of quantum hardware to predictive modelling of superconducting pairing mechanisms, directly informing materials design for next-generation superconducting technologies.

Dimensions

Akpata, E., Ojegun, E. & Enaibe, A. E. (2024). Numerical Methods of Strongly Correlated Electrons in One Dimension Finite Six Sites Systems. Journal of the Nigerian Association of Mathematical Physics, 66, 177 – 190. https://doi.org/10.60787/jnamp-v66-325.

Altman, E., Brown, K. R., Carleo, G., Carr, L. D., Demler, E., Chin, C., DeMarco, B., Economou, S. E., Eriksson, M. A., Fu, K.-M. C., & others. (2021). Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities. PRX Quantum, 2(1), 017003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.017003

Anand, A., Schleich, P., Alperin-Lea, S., Jensen, P. W. K., Sim, S., Díaz-Tinoco, M., Kottmann, J. S., Degroote, M., Izmaylov, A. F., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2022). A quantum computing view on unitary coupled cluster theory. Chemical Society Reviews, 51(4), 1659–1684. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01060A

Bravyi, S., Dial, O., Gambetta, J. M., Gil, D., & Nazario, Z. (2022). The future of quantum computing with superconducting qubits. Journal of Applied Physics, 132(16), 160902. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103572

Cai, Z., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Huggins, W. J., Li, Y., McClean, J. R., & O’Brien, T. E. (2023). Quantum error mitigation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 95(4), 045005. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005

Daley, A. J., Bloch, I., Kokail, C., Flannigan, S., Pearson, N., Troyer, M., & Zoller, P. (2022). Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature, 607(7920), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6

Haghshenas, R., Gray, J., Potter, A. C., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2022). Variational power of quantum circuit tensor networks. Physical Review X, 12(1), 011047. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011047

Hofstetter, W. & Qin, T. (2018). Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Condensed Matter Systems. Journal of Physics B: Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 51(8), 1-24. https://10.1088/1361-6455/aaa31b.

Kim, Y., Eddins, A., Anand, S., Wei, K. X., van den Berg, E., Rosenblatt, S., Nayfeh, H., Wu, Y., Zaletel, M., Temme, K., & Kandala, A. (2023). Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance. Nature, 618(7965), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3

Lee, J., Berry, D. W., Gidney, C., Huggins, W. J., McClean, J. R., Babbush, R., & Wiebe, N. (2023). Even more efficient quantum computations of chemistry through tensor hypercontraction. PRX Quantum, 4(3), 030305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030305

Morvan, A., Villalonga, B., Mi, X., Mandrà, S., Bengtsson, A., Klimov, P. V., Chen, Z., Hong, S., Erickson, C., Drozdov, I. K., & others. (2023). Phase transitions in random circuit sampling. Nature, 624(7990), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06927-5

Qin, M., Schäfer, T., Andergassen, S., Corboz, P., & Gull, E. (2022). The Hubbard model: A computational perspective. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 13, 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-090921-033648

Robledo-Moreno, J., Mazzola, G., Miessen, A., Kraus, A., Sokolov, I. O., Groß, J., Bäumer, E., Francis, A., Winkler, K., Gao, F., & others. (2024). Chemistry beyond exact solutions on a quantum-centric supercomputer. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.05068. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.05068

Rosenberg, E., Schmid, L., Greening, G., Li, A., Schöll, M., Choi, J., Zeiher, J., Bluvstein, D., Lukin, M. D., Kokail, C., & Demler, E. (2024). Dynamics of magnetism in a Fermi-Hubbard model. Science, 384(6693), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj1236

Satzinger, K. J., Liu, Y.-J., Smith, A., Knapp, C., Newman, M., Jones, C., Chen, Z., Bello, C., Bengtsson, A., Bilmes, A., & others. (2021). Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor. Science, 374(6572), 1237–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi8378

Stanisic, S., Bosse, J. L., Gambetta, F. M., Santos, R. A., Mruczkiewicz, W., O’Brien, T. E., Wecker, D., & Cade, C. (2022). Observing ground-state properties of the Fermi-Hubbard model using a scalable algorithm on a quantum computer. Nature Communications, 13, 5743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33335-4

Tindall, J., Fishman, M., Stoudenmire, E. M., & Sels, D. (2024). Efficient tensor network simulation of IBM’s Eagle kicked Ising experiment. PRX Quantum, 5(1), 010308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010308

Wietek, A., He, Y.-Y., White, S. R., Georges, A., & Stoudenmire, E. M. (2021). Stripes, antiferromagnetism, and the pseudogap in the doped Hubbard model at finite temperature. Physical Review X, 11(3), 031007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031007

Xu, S., Sun, Z.-Z., Wang, K., Li, H., Zhu, Z., Dong, H., Deng, J., Zhang, X., Chen, J., Wu, Y., & others. (2023). Digital simulation of projective non-Abelian anyons with 68 superconducting qubits. Chinese Physics Letters, 40(6), 060302. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/40/6/060302

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Nwachuku, D. N., & Osiegbu, E. (2026). Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Electron Systems for Next-Generation Superconducting Technology. Nigerian Journal of Theoretical and Environmental Physics, 4(2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.62292/

How to Cite

Nwachuku, D. N., & Osiegbu, E. (2026). Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Electron Systems for Next-Generation Superconducting Technology. Nigerian Journal of Theoretical and Environmental Physics, 4(2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.62292/